I do not like Natalia Pokolskaya. "Nyashny" Prosecutor of Crimea Natalya Poklonskaya: Let every Kuban citizen feel happy

Natalia Poklonskaya was born in the village of Mikhailovka in Ukraine on March 25, 1980, and since childhood she dreamed of working at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In 1990 she moved with her family to Evpatoria. This woman is a very persistent, principled, purposeful lawyer who graduated from the University of Internal Affairs in Kharkov. She managed to complete many difficult cases, to receive the rank of major general and to take the post of prosecutor of Crimea since 2014, thanks to the perseverance and tough position of her views and principles.

In recent years, Natalia has gained considerable popularity. Her personality flashed on the pages of the Internet and attracted the attention of many users. Therefore, below will be given ten facts about why the prosecutor was able to capture the attention of people. It should be noted that Natalia is included in the ranking of the 10 most attractive women in Russia.

1. Beginning of work of Natalia Poklonskaya

Initially, Natalia worked in the Kiev prosecutor's office. During the referendum in Crimea, she came there to visit relatives. In view of the events of 2014 in Ukraine, the girl made it known that she was ready to provide Crimea with any support and assistance, so that the same thing happened here as in her homeland.

Therefore, in March 2014, Natalya began work in the Crimean prosecutor's office, and in May of the same year, Vladimir Putin signed a decree stating that now Poklonskaya is the prosecutor of the peninsula. According to Natalia, she is ashamed that she is a citizen of Ukraine and fully shares Russian politics. In his daughter, the prosecutor fosters respect for Russia.

2. The popularity of the "cute" prosecutor

Natalia Poklonskaya is widely known on the Internet, especially in Japan. What contributed to this fame? As soon as the girl took the post of prosecutor of the Republic of Crimea, she gave a press conference, which the young journalist distributed on the Internet.

The appearance and special manner of speaking of the prosecutor attracted attention: Natalia's phrases quickly turned into quotes, the Japanese saw her as a potential anime character and immediately made her a hero of Japanese cartoons, drawing her and creating videos with her.

3. Natalia's personality has become popular in different countries

The popularity of Poklonskaya increased not only in Japan, but also in Russia and Ukraine. Only in these states did Natalia achieve success a little later. Internet users also made Natalia a kind of cartoon character, they wrote about her in newspapers, magazines, filmed in reports.

The woman herself speaks of her popularity embarrassedly, perhaps she does not really like it. She would like people to like her more. And Natalia's daughter says she is proud of her mother.

4. The prosecutor makes time for a hobby

Natalia Poklonskaya is interested not only in work. She plays the piano very well and loves drawing. Natalia devotes time to physical education and even passed the TRP standards in Sochi at the prosecutor's sports day, having done exercises for the press.

She also loves to watch figure skating. According to her, the girl prosecutor must be beautiful and fit, and she justifies her opinion. Natalia respects Nicholas II, even in her office there is a portrait of him.

5. The most popular video with Natalia Poklonskaya

By the way, the most popular clip on the Internet, posted on Youtube entitled " Nyash myash”Created by user Enjoykin, scored as many views as some famous show business stars do not. Among Russian videos, this is the most popular, gaining almost six million views in five days.

6. Date of match

Natalia Poklonskaya's birthday is March 18th. In 2014, on this day, she turned 34 years old, and the Crimean Peninsula and Sevastopol were admitted to the Russian Federation.

7. What happened to Natalia's work in Ukraine?

When Natalia received the status of the Crimean prosecutor, she was formally still an employee of the Ukrainian General Prosecutor. However, she was later fired when she clearly expressed her views towards the Ukrainian authorities and said that she did not want to live in a country ruled by bandits. Poklonskaya had the honor to accept the certificate of an employee of the Russian prosecutor from the state prosecutor general, Yuri Chaika.

8. Attacks on the prosecutor

The fragile girl-prosecutor was assassinated several times. For the first time this happened at the entrance of Natalia herself in Evpatoria in 2011. Because of this, Poklonskaya's facial muscles were disrupted, so since then she can speak “ through clenched teeth».

And in 2014, when she was already working in the Crimean prosecutor's office, a bomb was discovered right at her place of work, the effect of which spreads up to 350 meters.

9. "Hunt" for fragile Natalia

After Natalia received the status of a Russian prosecutor, Ukraine opened a criminal case against the former employee " for participating in the seizure of power". Poklonskaya even started looking for Ukrainian law enforcement agencies for “ actions leading to violent seizure of power". The woman herself says that she is not afraid at all " hunting" to myself.

10. Leaving the prosecutor's office

Since September 2016, Natalya is no longer a prosecutor. The woman passed the elections to the State Duma and has since headed the committee for the control of the Duma income. Therefore, she was forced to leave her post, which glorified her throughout the world.

Yesterday I published a post about Natalia Poklonskaya, who was to the Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika, in connection with the screening of the blasphemous (in her opinion) film "Matilda", as well as with regard to the deprivation of citizenship of one of the Crimean prosecutors.
Just in case, if anyone has not seen it yet, you can watch this appeal here.


The reviews for my article were different. The attitude towards Natalia Poklonskaya is ambiguous. I understand it.
Some people really do not like the fact that Poklonskaya seeks to ban the screening of a film that he considers blasphemous.
Say - what right does she have to tell us what to watch and what not? Who is she anyway!
If she doesn't like semolina porridge - let her not eat it at all. But let him not tell others what they can eat and what they cannot.
And in general - freedom of creativity! No one has the right to tell an artist how to create!
If an artist somehow perceives certain events in a special way, this is his personal vision of the world and no one has the right to prevent him from looking at reality from one angle or another. You give a variety of tastes! ..

However, my dears, look at one typical example that takes place literally in front of your nose.
There was such an artist in Russia - Pyotr Pavlensky.
A very original young man who nailed his balls in Red Square, sewed up his mouth, cut his ear, set fire to the door of the headquarters in Lubyanka, wrapped himself naked in barbed wire ... Well, in general, he expressed himself as best he could.
And he got away with everything, because in our terrible mordor, it is generally accepted that the artist can do everything - from the word at all.

But in the end, Povlensky became unbearably stuffy in this prison of peoples, groaning under the yoke of a bloody gebny - and he emigrated to beautiful civilized France.
There, in France, he arranged (so to speak, out of professional habit) a single action -. I expressed myself, in short.

And instantly he was in a psychiatric hospital ...

But what about freedom of expression? !!! And what about the freedom of creativity? !!! ..
And the freedom of your creativity and self-expression, guys, in civilized countries ends where the interests of other people begin. And - the point.
Let's imagine for a moment that in our country some director, exclusively using his own funds, made a film about how a wonderful good-natured dreamer-idealist named Hitler destroys millions of terrible subhumans in order to save the human world from the threat of degeneration ... That is, it saves our planet from evil.
And for this he is killed by such utter scoundrels as Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill.
Have you presented? ..

No - I personally would not care. I would take such a "performance" with humor - and maybe even go once to see this movie.
But I am tormented by vague suspicions that on the part of a considerable number of other citizens there would be a real hysteria, turning into convulsions and jumping to the ceiling.

What do we see now?

We see that a film was shot with state money (that is, with the money of all citizens-taxpayers), which is blasphemous in the eyes of a certain number of these same citizens (if I am not mistaken, Poklonskaya has collected one hundred thousand letters with indignant reviews; and in fact it is far from all dissatisfied, write such letters).
And, in response to the indignant demands of these people to prohibit the film from showing, they are defiantly shown the middle finger, they call them fanatics, cattle, dullards who do not understand high art, and they say: scamper under the bench! Hands off the artist! This is how he sees the world - and you will not tell him how to look at the world differently! ..

Actually, to me personally, the film "Matilda" is deeply on the drum.
But I don’t understand: why are people who do not want to defame the memory of the executed royal family - worse than those people who would not want someone to defame the memory of the Jews killed during the Holocaust?
Why can you rinse the tsar who was shot by the Bolsheviks as you like - but at the same time you cannot rinse those who were shot by the Nazis as you like?
Why, in some cases, the director (and his fellow workers) can defiantly put the device on the protesters - and in other cases the same director will timidly tuck his tail?

Or are the Russians somehow worse than the Jews? A?..
Or maybe the Orthodox have less rights to respect than the Jews? ..
Why is a fascist swastika painted by someone somewhere on the walls of a synagogue is interpreted as vandalism and a reason for a major scandal - while dancing in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior is perceived as a cute prank of silly girls who simply have nothing to judge for? ..
Why in Russia the protection of the feelings of ORTHODOX believers is perceived as some kind of strange nonsense, while the feelings of believers of any other denominations are something sacred and inviolable?
Why even the CORRECT name of the Russians - VELIKOROSSY - is practically not used in Russia and is considered almost indecent?
Why do cultural figures, who shamelessly take money from the state, absolutely seriously believe that the state has no right to tell them that it is possible to withdraw this money and what is not? ..
And not only that (remembering Serebrennikov), they generally put some of this money into their own pockets - and they are terribly indignant, pretending to be sufferers for truth and for freedom of art, when they are required to report on them ...

Is it a state or a colony in our country? ..

Let's imagine that you gave money to hired workers so that they dig a hole three meters deep and five meters in diameter for you.
And they dug two meters deep and three meters in diameter. And they replied to your claims that they see the world that way, and that you are wrong when you demand something else, and in general you don’t understand anything about digging holes.
How would you like it? ..

As for the semolina example ...
Guys - I'm not going to tell anyone whether he has semolina or not.
But if somewhere they start selling poisoned semolina to buyers with strychnine added to it, then we need to talk not about freedom of trade, but about a crime.
I have nothing against the free sale of decoys.
But I am categorically against the POISONED semolina being sold freely.

But - may I be wrong?
Maybe any restrictions are evil?
Fine! Let's then remove ALL restrictions - to the last one.
You give FULL freedom of speech and creativity! In any direction!
I personally do not care. I am even more in favor.
But are you ready for this? ..

And as for the prosecutor, who, according to Natalia Poklonskaya's statement, was deprived of Russian citizenship after he stood up for the believers: this is already pure revenge. Not punishment, but revenge.
If the prosecutor was wrong about something, it means that they should have done with him as provided for by the provisions of the Criminal Code. And he, instead, was subtly avenged. So it turns out ...

You know, I would not be surprised if one day Natalia Poklonskaya herself is also deprived of Russian citizenship.
A brutal roll has already been flooded onto it from all sides. YouTube is replete with videos in which she is literally rinsed in mud (which, by the way, does not bother her at all - this is so, by the way).
Here the Banderaites and the representatives of our Russian ilite (not only creative ones) came together in a touching unity.
They found a common point of contact, they found a common target for persecution.
Well, of course! The representatives of the ilika thought that Poklonskaya was the same as themselves.
It will take a little bit of rest, and then it will taste, get used to it, wear off, look around, get comfortable in the State Duma - and will be part of the herd. Devouring, shitting, shameless and raking.
And she rested her horn. And what about! She rose to her death - and did not move. And - not at all for the sake of their personal gain (they would understand and forgive this), but for the sake of some lofty concepts ...
Add to this her natural cuteness.
Well, how was it on such - and not pounce with a squeal and grunt?! ..

As a matter of fact - that is why I thought very hard when I saw what a rush rushing towards her from both sides.
I took this sympumpulum with humor.
But when he saw how things were going, he said to himself: stop-stop-stop. I have nothing to do in the herd of vicious cattle. I am a lonely wanderer in this world, and if I suddenly find myself in the general crowd screaming "Crucify him!" - this will mean that something is very wrong with me ...

In general - I think that Poklonskaya will be devoured sooner or later.
It is possible that, indeed, they will be deprived of Russian citizenship and handed over to the Bandera people to be devoured - fortunately, this will not be the first such case.
But Bandera's people are now cunning too. If something like this happened, they would treat Poklonskaya in about the same way as they did with Andrei Wart - that is, they would calmly interrogate her and release her on recognizance not to leave.
And then the paid propagandists will have to compose a fairy tale that it was originally sent to Russia by the Ukrainian special services.
This is exactly what they say now about Andrei Wart, one of the ideologues of the Russian spring, who was extradited to Ukraine.
You have to say something to justify your meanness and your idiocy ...

Once again I want to say - I personally do not care about the film "Matilda". As well as its creators. And Poklonskaya is no one to me - I personally do not know her.
But if a certain part of believers feels offended by this film, then the most reasonable way out of this situation would be to apologize to the believers. Publicly. Not to anyone, namely the director. And to say that this will not happen again. Just five minutes of verbal repentance on the air - when a person sees in front of him not those to whom he is apologizing, but only the TV camera.
And the film itself should be put on the shelf.
And that's all - on this all passions would subside.
That is exactly what would be forced to do such a director who would shoot (say) an anti-Semitic film. And it is unlikely that he only got off with this ...

So why are those who made a film that defame (according to a number of believers) the royal family persist?
What is the reason that they took a bite at the bit and do not want to reckon with anything at all?
Or maybe Poklonskaya caught something very well, understood something very well (which the general public still does not understand) and stepped on someone's sore corn? Loose the snake ball?

Natalia Poklonskaya is a well-known woman, but stubborn. I endured for a long time, expecting that she herself would come to her senses, but apparently in vain.

Natalya stuck to the director of the film Matilda, like a bath leaf to his ass.

The newly minted baby girl does not keep in touch not only with a sense of style, but also with a sense of reality.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t believe in the adequacy of a woman who wears a coat that resembles a synthetic Taiwanese plaid from the market.

The one from the touch to which the sparks fly. An eternal gift from colleagues, damn it.

Natasha dilutes her electrifying "leopard", which, however, looks more like a hyena, with her grandmother's "in a flower" scarf.

Photo: Encyclopedia of Animals

No, well, what about? Like flora. And how - how is it? - fauna. Nails again - a scarf to match, as was customary 50 years ago. Little red ones.

No, I understand everything: Natasha was formed as a person in Ukraine. They have their own fluffy style there, sharovany and embroidered shirts. Still, a woman crawling out of her house to Moscow in 2017 in this form raises questions about her adequacy.

Lost. Lost in geography and time. Don't fumble. No matter how much he fumbles about where she is, what she is, when she is.

That's why he gets up, don’t understand what, probably.

Not so long ago, for example, a bust was pacified at Poklonskaya. No, not her own: Natalia has almost none of it. Purely nominal chest, to hang orders, issued for some unknown reason.

Photo: Bloknot.ru

Poklonskaya put on a blouse from a curtain, some kind of crazy caftan and went in the form of a neat granny to iron the tsar's bust. And this bust of her was pacified, about which Natalia immediately informed the whole world.

Photo: Bloknot.ru

That's when I realized: Poklonskaya perfectly fit into the State Dura of the Russian Federation.

And then Natasha threw out a new feint - she clung to the cinema. The tsar, it turns out, was not quite a saint in the film - he even, scared to think, copulated outside of a church marriage!

Natalia, as a prosecutor, could not endure this and ordered an examination of the film.

She did not like how the image of Tsar Nicholas II was presented in the cinema, whose bust was streaming myrrh. I did not like it so much that all Natasha's religious feelings were offended.

The examination was carried out by 4 comrades - all professors and academicians.

The examination ruled that the film truly offends the feelings of believers, and its public demonstration is unacceptable.

Razhachno? Do not hurry. Not so simple.

All jokes, but now the filmmakers will have to answer under Articles 148 and 282 of the Criminal Code, since Poklonskaya sent the results of the examination to the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation.

I have read the contents of the document.

Even for me, who had seen a lot of bureaucratic foolishness, the hair on the back of my head began to move. This is pure idiocy. Absurd. Some kind of madness.

For example, here is an excerpt from the conclusion:

“Strengthens the negative image of the character“ Nicholas II ”by attributing to him a choice in favor of the disgusting, completely ugly (from the point of view of classical European and, in particular, Russian ideas about female beauty) in appearance and other physical characteristics of Matilda Kshesinskaya (in her famous photographs clearly visible: protruding crooked teeth, an elongated face shape, making it outwardly similar to a mouse or a rat, an awkward figure) in contrast with the objectively bright classical European beauty Alexandra Fedorovna.

So this is it - what the dog rummaged. The teeth stick out crooked. Saint Nicholas, according to experts, could not mate a mouse or a rat.

In general, according to the law, this is called eugenics. The Nazis also measured teeth and skulls. Based on the measurements, they concluded: a purebred Aryan cannot fuck this woman!

Photo: Komló Média

In a country that suffered from fascism, like no other, is such an "expert" opinion permissible today? Is it true?

Photo: Social networks

If so, then Hitler and his accomplices would have approved. However, let's look at the faces of the "experts" themselves.

Photo: Social networks

What do you think? What thoughts do you visit when looking at these faces "from the point of view of classical European and, in particular, Russian ideas about ... beauty"?

Or maybe we can compare Natasha herself with Matilda Kseshinskaya?

Photo: Social networks

Who, in your opinion, is more like “a mouse or a rat”?

It would be funny if it weren't so sad. Still, a "criminal offense" for nothing can be hanged on filmmakers simply because a woman wrapped in a Chinese synthetic blanket will not stop at all.

By the way, in my opinion, Nicholas II was the worst emperor in the history of Russia. Fucked up the empire, renounced the power given by God. But even he probably does somersaults in his coffin when Poklonskaya, in the company of "experts", measures the skull of his mistress, the ballerina Matilda Kseshinskaya.

What do you think should be banned: the film "Matilda" or the deputy activities of Natalia Poklonskaya? Why?

State Duma deputy and former Crimean prosecutor told on the air of Radio Komsomolskaya Pravda (97.2 FM) why she proposes to bury Lenin, how the scandal around Matilda ended and where did she get a reverent attitude towards Nicholas II

"ABOUT" MATILDA "SAID EVERYTHING"

Despite your protests, Matilda was released. Although many were waiting for it like the end of the world. But nothing happened - everyone is alive and well. Was the game worth the candle?

Do you know how a politician differs from a prosecutor? The first one competently bypasses uncomfortable topics, and the second, the main thing is to prevent violation of the law. I probably remain 100% at heart as a prosecutor. It doesn't matter to me whether the topic is convenient or not. I understand all the consequences, and I am going through them now. But I have already spoken in full about "Matilda" - I have been talking for a whole year. Whoever needs it heard. To repeat myself, I think, is wrong. As one Arab sage said: when a friend told me once, I will believe, but when I began to repeat myself, this is no longer convincing. I will not repeat myself.

Let Alexey Uchitel (director of "Matilda" - Ed.) Comment on what contribution there is for him.

- Many have accused you of selfishness. How do you feel about this phenomenon?

The existence of such a movement, whether it exists or not, is not known for certain to me. Tsarist life, extremism, the Christian state - I was accused of everything. It turns out absurd. In Ukraine, I am accused of organizing a terrorist attack in Crimea, of seizing power. Probably, the entire Ukrainian criminal code was attributed to me. It's the same here. I personally gave impetus to checks from the Russian prosecutor's office on the fact of extremists and various sects. These accusations are as absurd as the Ukrainian ones.

- Why do you have such a reverent attitude towards Nicholas II?

There are personal questions. I would not like to let everyone into my soul.

- You lost this right when you became a State Duma deputy.

No one can lose the right to faith, to privacy. As far as my public life is concerned, I am open and accessible.

In a short period of time, from an atmosphere of general admiration, you found yourself, if not in persecution, then in an aura of irritation. How did you deal with it?

People evaluate your work differently. There are those who disagree - that's okay. I take it calmly. If I took care of my image, tried to please everyone, so that everyone would love me, I would probably occupy a different position. But I do everything sincerely and conscientiously. If I wanted to be nyasha for everyone, I would sit, smile at everyone, take pictures and not go anywhere.

- How do you manage to keep yourself in such shape?

The foundation is what was laid by nature and parents. And then you build the walls yourself.

"MOVIE ABOUT AYDAROVTS DEMANDED TO BE PROHIBITED "

Why did you not speak out against Bandera films at the recent Artdokfest festival in Moscow with the same Matildovian enthusiasm? In the same place, a movie was shown about the reprisals of good Aydar members over the unwanted separatists.

I found out about this late. Received an appeal. I sent it to the Ombudsman and the Attorney General to investigate. We have an article in the Criminal Code: "propaganda of violence in hostilities, justification of fascism, Nazism." She works. And it works thanks to my Crimean prosecutors - we were the first to initiate a case under this article. But I cannot go out into the street, stand with a poster in front of the court and say that I do not agree with the film - this is wrong.

While you were fighting Matilda, many accused you of not doing your job, not looking for corrupt deputies. And then you slashed at the richest Duma member. What has he done?

In the Duma, I am the head of the specialized Commission for Control over the Income and Expenses of Deputies, which is starting to gain momentum. Recently, an extraordinary meeting was held, where a decision was made on the presence of conflicts of interest for one State Duma deputy - this is Andrei Palkin. In the interests of his and his sons' business, he sent parliamentary inquiries. His explanations are as follows: "And what, the sons are not members of society?" The decision of the commission is addressed to the chairman of the State Duma so that he takes action.

- And outside the commission?

A striking example is Crimea, my region. In 2017, we achieved the initiation of a criminal case against officials, the administration of the city of Simferopol. Through their fault, budget money was unreasonably spent on laying out paving slabs on the main street. They mastered the budget very well: the tiles deteriorated the next day. There were such holes, people complained.

"PEOPLE ASK TO BURY LENIN"

- You offered to bury Lenin. Why did Ilyich not please you?

Half of the Russians are offering to bury him. There are opinion polls. I told my personal opinion. As a deputy, a lot of people turn to me with a request to organize Lenin's burial.

Do you understand that you are no longer perceived as a human unit? What you say triggers a different reaction.

I understand well. And if I, on my own behalf, Natalia Poklonskaya, said that I want Lenin to be buried, that's one question. But I don’t do that. I say that a lot of requests have been received in my name. And I, as a politician Poklonskaya, believe that this position also deserves attention. Nobody can deprive this right.

Is it true that you, while working in the prosecutor's office of Ukraine in Crimea, demanded that everyone switch from Russian to Ukrainian? Were you a patriot of Ukraine?

I want to admit: in Ukraine I spoke Ukrainian very badly. When I was serving in the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, there were demands to speak Ukrainian. It was difficult for me. I was constantly twisting sentences and words. And the dialect was different, not the same as we learned in school. I think someone is specifically saying that now.

“IN THE MIND OF ME JUST CALLED A PROSECUTOR "

Don't you miss the general's shoulder straps of the prosecutor - when was it possible to give orders and were obliged to obey you?

I continue to be an officer. I will not lie - I remain a prosecutor even in the Duma. Some people jokingly call me that. I conducted a commission on the income and expenses of the deputies. The meeting was closed and without journalists. One of the deputies got nervous and said: “Don't talk to us as a prosecutor. You are not in the prosecutor's office. " Of course, I am a deputy. But I grew up and studied in the prosecutor's office.

- Do you visit Donbass? And how will it end there?

I was born in Donbass.

- And after 2014?

Unfortunately I was not. My grandmother lives there. She categorically does not want to leave, because this is her homeland, both her grandfather and her mother are buried there. I did not go to Donbass for obvious reasons. But I think I can do it. And I will go to Donbass. And there will be peace.